RIAs join move to right a 401(k) wrong: Lopsided plan expenses -- a non-DOL issue
Participants using mutual funds with active management pay for their passively managed brethren; with fiduciary issues being taken for real, this is a problem
Fidelity
|Schwab
|LPL
|ERISA
|Vanguard
|401(k)
|Penniall & Associates
|Milliman
|Drinker Biddle & Reath
|Sheridan Road
|Diversified
|Island Light Capital
|Securian
Elmer Rich III
So if there are more expenses incurred with making decisions to move funds more — who should bear that cost? Not the decision maker?
Should the employees who move their money less and generate fewer expenses for the plan subsidize those who move their money more? Is that the writer’s argument?
In addition, there is good research showing that the more money is moved the more money is lost.
Plan Participant
Does it work both ways? If a participant does not feel they are benefitting from the actively managed products the advisor recommends and opts for the passive options, are they excluded from paying a share of the advisor’s expense? Interesting that advisors are recommending or demanding this approach.
Reality Check
Absolutely idiotic. What happens to participation when I charge a $500 per capita to a $750 account balance? How many people with low balances are going to stick around for this nonsense? Wait until the ADP/ACP testing kicks in. Can you find someone sane or knowledgeable for this column?
Lisa Shidler
Hey guys, You are right. The whole point of this story is that advisors are trying to make the plan costs fair for participants and make sure that employers understand how everyone is being charged. I personally know many business owners who don’t understand what they’re paying for their 401(k) plan. In addition, I believe the RIAs that I spoke with all said that they feel these issues need to be addressed case-by-case. Reality Check is right – Of course it’s not fair to charge $500 per capita for a $750 account balance. And, let’s face it, in a larger company you will have many small balances and large balances. But for advisors who work with very small companies – say with less than 10 employees they may decide to use a different structure.
What is clearly happening and what we’re addressing is that advisors and employers are trying to look into different ways to make the costs as fair as possible for all employees.
Elmer Rich III
Here are some questions:
- How do we define “fair?” Then how do we operationalize?
- Are there really that many plan sponsors who don’t know what they’re paying? Would like to see data.
- Is cheaper better?
Neal A. Thomasl
The department of Labor must not have enough to do. Kind of reminds me of the changes in 403b a couple of years ago. Do not see the need for more and more complexity- except for jobs for attorneys.
Elmer Rich III
Well ERISA is the law and pretty clearly states all material benefits must be formally communicated and on file with the plan sponsor.
However, I have been told if all other plan sponsors are paying $10,000 per account, then it falls within prudent “expert” bounds. Fiduciary does not have any absolute or even objetive standards. it is only what is common practices of fiduciary peers that counts.
If they are all wrong — so be it.
Related Moves
Christa Carone, an ex-Fidelity and Xerox marketing whiz, steps onto a slippery slope at LPL with a daunting task -- to consolidate a NASCAR size brand portfolio... or not?
With no CMO since August, the chief marketing officer will play catch up for a company still hungry to buy more branded B2B and B2C players.
April 2, 2024 at 1:28 AM
Joanna Rotenberg is departing Fidelity Investments after only two years, writing that she traveled 20,000 miles and successfully split her retail division into wealth and brokerage units
At her hire, analysts were adamant the head of Fidelity retail had 'big shoes to fill' to replace legendary Kathleen Murphy and her task of 'digitiizing' retail was no small ask
December 16, 2023 at 2:22 AM
Biz Briefs: The sorry scene at my local First Republic branch • Schwab launches new (smaller) lay-off round • Schwab hoovers pennies passing FINRA fee to clients • Gensler pleas for funds • Fidelity owner's private equity pres. retires • an Orion-Envestnet staff switcheroo • LPL dumps FutureAdvisor
Range Rovers screeched in and drivers joined a grim queue to get their cash, and cookie • The Schwab-TDA deal cull count now stands at roughly 3.5% of its staff • FMR's hockey star president has stepped down • SEC chief wants more enforcers • An Envestnet executive proves joining a rival is good business • LPL now has an in-house robot.
April 29, 2023 at 1:36 AM
Fidelity will hire 4,000 staff in first half -- a staggering number but a tapering off from 'unprecedented' rate in 2021-2022 that catapulted it to 68,000 employees
The $10.3 trillion giant explains its hiring -- in a layoff environment -- as an RIA-like goal, namely having the human bandwidth to develop 'lifetime' relationships with its 40 million investors
February 17, 2023 at 2:49 AM
See more related moves
LPL Financial
RIA-Friendly Broker-Dealer, RIA Welcoming Breakaways, Advisory Firm
Top Executive: Dan Arnold
Sheridan Road Financial
Consulting Firm
Top Executive: Jim O'Shaughnessy
Securian Financial Group
401k Plan Consultant
Top Executive: Robert Senkler